In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-1680 v2 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1680 v2
No clear advantages
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 215 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
215 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$247.3
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1680 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
48%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1680 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $1,723.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
