In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-1650 v2 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $58 cheaper!
Xeon E5-1650 v2
- Up to 20% cheaper – $229.95 vs $288.00
- Up to 20% cheaper
- Up to 12% better value in Deathloop – $1.05 vs $1.19/FPS
- Up to 12% better value in Deathloop
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 3 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 11 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Average FPS
219 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
91%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
79%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
88%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
