In Deathloop, the Xeon E5-1650 v2 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $69 cheaper!
Xeon E5-1650 v2
- Up to 23% cheaper – $229.95 vs $298.98
- Up to 23% cheaper
- Up to 14% better value in Deathloop – $1.05 vs $1.22/FPS
- Up to 14% better value in Deathloop
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 12% faster in Deathloop – 245 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Average FPS
219 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
90%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
76%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
86%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1650 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
