Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 3128 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 9% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 179 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$148
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $148 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 258 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |