In Atomfall, the Xeon E3-1270 v5 is slightly slower than the Core i9-9900KS. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Consumes up to 37% less energy – 80 vs 127 Watts
- Consumes up to 37% less energy
Core i9-9900KS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 221 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 9 days newer – Oct 28, 2019 vs Oct 19, 2015
- Is 4 years and 9 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Core i9-9900KS: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Core i9-9900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Core i9-9900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1270 v5
Oct 19th, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Core i9-9900KS
Oct 28th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1270 v5 Oct 19th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900KS Oct 28th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Released | Oct 28th, 2019 |
$339.00 | MSRP | $513.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
80 W | Power Consumption | 127 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
