In Atomfall, the Xeon E3-1270 v5 is slower than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 80 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 33% less energy
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 255 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 19, 2015
- Is 7 years and 2 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
255 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
191 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.56/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1270 v5
Oct 19th, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
41%
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
96 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1270 v5 Oct 19th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 7800X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$339.00 | MSRP | $449.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM5 |
80W | Power Consumption | 120W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
