Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon E-2176M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 459 days newer than Xeon E-2176M.
Advantages of Xeon E-2176M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E-2176M - 424 vs 414 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
424
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2176M | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |