Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E-2176M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1736 days newer than Xeon E-2176M.
Advantages of Xeon E-2176M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E-2176M - 270 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2176M - 16 vs 12 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
270
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$849.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7196 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2176M | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |