Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1841 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900K - 48 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 23% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 499 vs 406 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $432.98 vs $894.99
- Up to 60% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.87 vs $2.20 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $894.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
499
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$432.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $432.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
48 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
250 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |