Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 837 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $624.95 vs $1070.00
- Up to 31% better value when playing Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $3.86 vs $5.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 180 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 19% better in Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 192 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 48 vs 32 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
162
84%
Value, $/FPS
$3.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$624.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $624.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 283 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.57/FPS
69%
Price, $
$1070
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,070 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 285 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Whitehaven | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 48 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |