Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 418 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 30% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $624.95 vs $894.99
- Up to 30% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $2.65 vs $3.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 180 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 238 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 48 vs 32 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
236
99%
Value, $/FPS
$2.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$624.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $624.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 259 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
238
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.76/FPS
70%
Price, $
$894.99
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for $894.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 261 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Whitehaven | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 48 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |