In Rust, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is slightly faster than the Core i7-920. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $106 more expensive!
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 8% faster in Rust – 225 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer
Core i7-920
- Up to 53% cheaper – $94.00 vs $199.99
- Up to 53% cheaper
- Up to 50% better value in Rust – $0.44 vs $0.88/FPS
- Up to 50% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 130 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i7-920: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
225 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
47%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
50%
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
209 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
76%
Price, $
$94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i7-920 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i7-920 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
