In Atomfall, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is slightly faster than the Core i7-920. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $107 more expensive!
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 208 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer
Core i7-920
- Up to 54% cheaper – $92.84 vs $199.99
- Up to 54% cheaper
- Up to 49% better value in Atomfall – $0.49 vs $0.96/FPS
- Up to 49% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 130 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i7-920: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
46%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
51%
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
186 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
90%
Price, $
$92.84
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i7-920 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Core i7-920 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| SP3r2 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 180W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
