Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 41% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10900F - 565 vs 402 FPS
- Up to 28% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10900F - $1.10 vs $1.53 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-10900F
- Up to 0% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $616.96 vs $619.99
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
565
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$619.99
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $619.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 437 minutes ago
Buy for $616.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 437 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7900X3D | vs | Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raphael | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
44.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |