Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 9 3900XT on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 567 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 9 3900XT.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 14% better in Starfield than Ryzen 9 3900XT - 72 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $76.78 vs $325.00
- Up to 79% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $1.07 vs $5.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 58 vs 105 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $76.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 58 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |