Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 82 days older than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $76.80 vs $143.81
- Up to 44% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-12600KF - $0.63 vs $1.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 58 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-12100F - 127 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
122
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6300 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
56%
Price, $
$143.81
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6300 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-12100F | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |