Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 2090 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $176.00 vs $574.75
- Up to 62% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-14900 - $1.39 vs $3.66 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 24% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 7 2700 - 157 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $176 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
Buy for $574.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |