Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900 is 2342 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 24% better in Remnant II than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 105 vs 85 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $574.75 vs $621.95
- Up to 25% better value when playing Remnant II than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $5.47 vs $7.32 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
105
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$574.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $574.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Buy for $621.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900 | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |