The Ryzen 3 3200G is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-6700K, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $62.40 cheaper!
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 45% cheaper – $75.00 vs $137.40
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 29% less energy – 65 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-6700K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i7-6700K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6700K
Aug 5th, 2015
Average FPS
188
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, $
$137.4
54%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
56%
Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i7-6700K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i7-6700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 3200G vs Core i7-6700K in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-6700K
Aug 5th, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-6700K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 5th, 2015 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $339.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 91 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
