Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1277 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $79.00 vs $899.99
- Up to 90% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-13400F - $0.49 vs $4.94 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 12% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 3 3200G - 182 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |