The Ryzen 3 2200G is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $27.98 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 2200G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Up to 22% cheaper – $102.02 vs $130.00
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Ryzen 3 2200G vs FX-8320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 2200G
Feb 12th, 2018
Average FPS
178
100%
Min 1% FPS
118
100%
Price, $
$130
78%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
84%
Ryzen 3 2200G vs FX-8320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 2200G vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 2200G vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 2200G
Feb 12th, 2018
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 3 2200G | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$99.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
