The Phenom X4 9650 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-3770, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $60.05 cheaper!
Advantages of the Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 75% cheaper – $19.95 vs $80.00
- A better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i7-3770
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Phenom X4 9650 vs Core i7-3770 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Phenom X4 9650
Mar 27th, 2008
Average FPS
163
95%
Min 1% FPS
110
96%
Price, $
$19.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Phenom X4 9650 vs Core i7-3770 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Phenom X4 9650 vs Core i7-3770 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Phenom X4 9650 vs Core i7-3770 in core CPU performance specifications
Phenom X4 9650
Mar 27th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Phenom X4 9650 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $278.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Agena | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
