The Pentium G640 is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-3770, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $64.25 cheaper!
Advantages of the Pentium G640
- Up to 68% cheaper than the Core i7-3770 – $30.75 vs $95.00
- A much better value for money when playing games compared to the Core i7-3770
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than the Core i7-3770 – 65 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-3770
- A slightly faster gaming CPU than the Pentium G640
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than the Pentium G640 – 8 vs 2 threads
Pentium G640 vs Core i7-3770 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Pentium G640
Jun 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
167
98%
Min 1% FPS
112
97%
Price, $
$30.75
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Pentium G640 vs Core i7-3770 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Pentium G640 vs Core i7-3770 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Pentium G640 vs Core i7-3770 in core CPU performance specifications
Pentium G640
Jun 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Pentium G640 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Not Available | MSRP | $278.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
65 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
3 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |