The Core i7-3770 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3200G and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $6.63 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-3770
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 8% cheaper – $73.37 vs $80.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 65 vs 77 Watts
Core i7-3770 vs Ryzen 3 3200G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, $
$73.37
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Core i7-3770 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3770 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3770 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-3770 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
$278.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
77 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |