Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G640 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3523 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Pentium G640
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $24.31 vs $76.80
- Up to 66% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-12100F - $0.16 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 10% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Pentium G640 - 164 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Pentium G640 - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 8 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
FPS
149
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$24.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $24.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G640 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |