Buy on Amazon
$120
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Xeon X5690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3363 days newer than Xeon X5690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 16% better in Lost Ark than Xeon X5690 - 262 vs 226 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon X5690 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
262
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i3-10320 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110320
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1711 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon X5690
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5690 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
