Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 3722 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 56% better in F1 23 than Xeon X5680 - 239 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 65 vs 130 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
239
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8280 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |