Key Differences
In short — Xeon X5675 outperforms Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon X5675 is 403 days newer than Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Pentium G6950 - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
167
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Xeon | Collection | Pentium |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 73 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |