Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3363 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Xeon X5675 - 153 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5675 - 16 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6534 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |