Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Xeon X5670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 4018 days newer than Xeon X5670.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 34% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon X5670 - 145 vs 108 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5670 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5670 - 16 vs 12 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5670 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |