Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Xeon X5670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 3698 days newer than Xeon X5670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5670
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon X5670 - 432 vs 372 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5670 - 20 vs 12 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
432
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5670 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |