Buy on Amazon
$39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Xeon X5660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 2485 days newer than Xeon X5660.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5660
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in Sons Of The Forest than Xeon X5660 - 92 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon X5660 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
92
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5660
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5660 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
