Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Xeon X5570 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 4049 days newer than Xeon X5570.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 14% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon X5570 - 134 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5570 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5570 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9654 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5570 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Gainestown | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |