Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 2268 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Fortnite than Xeon W3680 - 224 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 16 vs 12 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
224
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3044 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |