Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 2560 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3670
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 130 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 155% better in League of Legends than Xeon W3670 - 168 vs 66 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3670 - 28 vs 12 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$385
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $385 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 28 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |