Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 1017 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3670
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 130 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon W3670 - 454 vs 451 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
454
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Xeon | Collection | FX |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |