Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 2870 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3565
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon W3565 - 413 vs 372 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3565 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
413
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |