Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 4713 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 64% better in Rust than Xeon W3565 - 254 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon W3565 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3565 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3565 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
254
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$230
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3565 | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |