Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 2214 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 4% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon W3550 - 121 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3550 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel 3.70 GHz Core i3-6100 3M Cache Processor (BX80662I36100)
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15365 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon W3550
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
