Buy on Amazon
$269
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2923 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3550
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 8% better in Apex Legends than Xeon W3550 - 278 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3550 - 24 vs 8 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
278
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Desktop Processor (YD192XA8AEWOF)
Buy for $269 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon W3550
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
