Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2135 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2135 is 238 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2135
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G3930T - 131 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2135 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2135 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2135 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon W | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |