Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Xeon E5530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 3892 days newer than Xeon E5530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5530
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 80 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 38% better in Rust than Xeon E5530 - 207 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5530 - 48 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
207
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1300
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5530 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Gainestown | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 280 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |