Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Xeon E5530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 3441 days newer than Xeon E5530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5530
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5530 - 171 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5530 - 32 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1075
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5530 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Gainestown | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |