Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 3490 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 20% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5520 - 136 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5520 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$410
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $410 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Gainestown | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |