Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 805 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 44 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Diablo IV than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 188 vs 164 FPS
- Up to 95% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $85.0 vs $1595.95
- Up to 95% better value when playing Diablo IV than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.45 vs $9.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5403 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 6 |
44 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |