Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700 - 28 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 29% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 130 vs 101 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2697 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-13700
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 14 | Cores | 16 |
28 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
