Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2697 v3 outperforms Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2697 v3 is 1296 days newer than Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-2100 - 125 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 28 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-2100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
28 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |