Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 167 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2697 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 12 | Cores | 24 |
| 24 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
