Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3550H is 1953 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3550H - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 163 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2697 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 3550H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3550H |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
