Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Core i5-2435M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2697 v2 is 731 days newer than Core i5-2435M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
- Performs up to 0% better in Fortnite than Core i5-2435M - 214 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2435M - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2435M
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2697 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-2435M
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-2435M |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
